Comparative analysis of China’s regulatory system for export of sensitive goods and international standards

I. Definition and scope of sensitive goods

(1) China’s definition

Dual-use items (Export Control Law)

Nuclear, biological, chemical and other weapons of mass destruction related

High-tech products (such as semiconductors, aerospace)

Key mineral resources (rare earth, etc.)

(2) International standards (Wassenaar Arrangement, etc.)

List of dual-use goods and technologies

Weapons and related materials

Nuclear Suppliers Group control list

Missile Technology Control Regime list

II. Comparison of regulatory frameworks

China’s system

Legal basis: Export Control Law, Customs Law, Foreign Trade Law

Administrative agencies: Ministry of Commerce (Export Control Bureau), General Administration of Customs, State Administration of Science, Technology and Industry for National Defense

Licensing system: Export operator registration system + license management

List management: Export operator registration system + license management Release of the “Catalogue of Dual-Use Items and Technologies Import and Export License Management”

Major international mechanisms

Multilateral export control mechanisms: Wassenaar Arrangement, NSG, MTCR, etc.

US system: EAR (Department of Commerce), ITAR (State Council) dual-track system

EU system: EU Dual-Use Items Regulation (EC) 2021/821

Japanese system: Special licensing system of the Foreign Exchange and Foreign Trade Law

III. Analysis of key differences

Control standards

China: Based on national security and development interests (Article 2 of the Export Control Law)

International: Focus on non-proliferation and regional security (Wassenaar Arrangement core principles)

Technology classification

China: Independently formulate control lists (including some internationally sensitive technologies)

International: Coordinated control lists (common classification of 42 member states)

Licensing procedures

China: Formal review (20 working days ) + substantive review (extended by 60 days)

US: Classification review (BIS average approval time 45 days)

EU: General license (valid within the EU)

Compliance requirements

China: Encouraging clauses for internal compliance system

International: General requirement to establish ICP (internal compliance program)

IV. Convergence and Differences

Convergence direction

Both adopt list management mode

Establish end-user and end-use control

Strengthen cross-border law enforcement cooperation (such as China-US export control dialogue mechanism)

Significant differences

Chinese characteristics: Emphasis on “overall national security concept”

International system: More emphasis on multilateral coordination mechanism

Technical standards: China has stricter control in some areas (such as rare earth processing technology)

V. Improvement suggestions

Aspects that China can learn from

Establish a hierarchical management system for enterprises (similar to the US “trusted customer” program)

Add Strengthen participation in multilateral mechanisms (currently a member of NSG but not a member of WA)

Improve compliance incentives (refer to EU “Compliance Enterprise” certification)

Inspiration from international experience

Develop a “Chinese version” of ICP standards

Optimize cross-departmental collaboration mechanisms (similar to the US ECCN classification system)

Strengthen forward-looking regulation of emerging technologies (such as quantum technology, AI)

VI. Typical cases

Semiconductor equipment exports

China: Export licenses for gallium and germanium in 2023

International: ASML lithography machine exports are subject to dual constraints of Dutch national control + Wassenaar Arrangement

Rare earth exports

China: Implement total mining control + export quotas (WTO compliance disputes)

International: Mainly indirectly controlled through supply chain security mechanisms

Note: The data in this article is as of December 2023, and the specific implementation standards need to be revised in accordance with the latest regulations. In actual operations, it is necessary to combine HS codes with control lists for cross-verification. It is recommended that companies consult professional trade compliance consultants at the same time.

发表回复

您的邮箱地址不会被公开。 必填项已用 * 标注